Wilfred
11-17-06, 02:45 AM
Well, it appears to be about time to deal with this persistant "recurring belly issue" that now seems to want more attention than previously.
To put things simply, the dominant concern has been venting of material into the bladder and urinary system and swelling of an area likely known as urogenital sinus, along with what appear to be lopsided or mangled female system components behind a dominantly male system.
Other than an extruded lowest rib, slightly angled pelvic bone with slight angling of one hip joint, and a notably feminine muscular composition (especially abdominal), the majority of the system appears to operate within the context of a normal male.
Any additional female components are significantly under-developed, with complete (though miniscule) control of muscle functioning.
Male and female systems are completely independant, only male exists on the surface with the exception of findable female muscle structures below the primary male, and some expected sensitivities.
No female characteristics are prevalent superficial, however inner structures appear stable though notably pre-purbertive; however based on muscle control, all female components appear operational with the only exception being an imballanced and slightly off center mounting.
Bladder control has reduced significantly in the male controlled structure over the last year, however, the budding muscular control on the female system appears to easily compensate (except:)
Main concern is any actuation of female components causes severe cramping (expected when no venting is operational) and forced venting of the left (swollen) sections is extremely ... antagonistic? ... no less leaves excessive mess for the male urinary system to pass.
I was never informed of any mechanical apparaus for venting mounted or added, and no visible scarring exists to indicate later addition, however, the apparent one-way purge characteristics suggest rerouting or additional structures... (could be natural, but low probability)
This is the first inquiry I have made for years, mainly as it has not been of concern to me, but at least two prolonged "notification" cycles have now happened, currently still bearing the second...
Please contact me directly via email " wilfredguerin@<hidden> " or messaging as specified, especially if you are one of these majoritively-female females who might have suggestions on dealing with internal pressure issues without aggrivating the incompatibility with the generally normal (except for being overrun by the girl parts lately) male systems.
Thanks in advance for your responses and suggestions on how to pursue these topics ;)
oh, and a "btw" for the obvious question: I've always had a solid preference for female preferring females, which at least both sets of parts agreed with, would prefer the female pars operational (at least to normal venting/control standards) to cease impeeding normal activities and preferably fixing surface characteristics to mesh with the pre-teen internals, without severely incapacitating normal male functionality if a future use may arise.
more in responses ;)
To put things simply, the dominant concern has been venting of material into the bladder and urinary system and swelling of an area likely known as urogenital sinus, along with what appear to be lopsided or mangled female system components behind a dominantly male system.
Other than an extruded lowest rib, slightly angled pelvic bone with slight angling of one hip joint, and a notably feminine muscular composition (especially abdominal), the majority of the system appears to operate within the context of a normal male.
Any additional female components are significantly under-developed, with complete (though miniscule) control of muscle functioning.
Male and female systems are completely independant, only male exists on the surface with the exception of findable female muscle structures below the primary male, and some expected sensitivities.
No female characteristics are prevalent superficial, however inner structures appear stable though notably pre-purbertive; however based on muscle control, all female components appear operational with the only exception being an imballanced and slightly off center mounting.
Bladder control has reduced significantly in the male controlled structure over the last year, however, the budding muscular control on the female system appears to easily compensate (except:)
Main concern is any actuation of female components causes severe cramping (expected when no venting is operational) and forced venting of the left (swollen) sections is extremely ... antagonistic? ... no less leaves excessive mess for the male urinary system to pass.
I was never informed of any mechanical apparaus for venting mounted or added, and no visible scarring exists to indicate later addition, however, the apparent one-way purge characteristics suggest rerouting or additional structures... (could be natural, but low probability)
This is the first inquiry I have made for years, mainly as it has not been of concern to me, but at least two prolonged "notification" cycles have now happened, currently still bearing the second...
Please contact me directly via email " wilfredguerin@<hidden> " or messaging as specified, especially if you are one of these majoritively-female females who might have suggestions on dealing with internal pressure issues without aggrivating the incompatibility with the generally normal (except for being overrun by the girl parts lately) male systems.
Thanks in advance for your responses and suggestions on how to pursue these topics ;)
oh, and a "btw" for the obvious question: I've always had a solid preference for female preferring females, which at least both sets of parts agreed with, would prefer the female pars operational (at least to normal venting/control standards) to cease impeeding normal activities and preferably fixing surface characteristics to mesh with the pre-teen internals, without severely incapacitating normal male functionality if a future use may arise.
more in responses ;)