Home | Donate | Contact | Updates | Search | Recommend   
Intersex Community Forums | Bodies Like Ours  

  Intersex Community Forums | Bodies Like Ours > Bodies Like Ours > In The News
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
05-30-03, 03:37 AM
Betsy
Gadabout
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In denial
Posts: 1,192
Article from the NYTimes

If Biology Is Destiny, When Shouldn't It Be?
>
>May 27, 2003
>By BARRON H. LERNER, M.D.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>What would you do if your baby was born intersex, with sex organs and
>external genitalia not clearly male or female? How would you choose
>whether to bring up your child as a boy or a girl and decide whether
>doctors should perform corrective genital surgery?
>
>A series of new studies and a book, "Intersex and Identity" (Rutgers
>University Press, 2003), seek to provide the answers to these
>questions. Yet despite this research, the ultimate choices may have
>less to do with a child's medical condition than with the hospital
>selected for childbirth. If this sounds like an anomaly in an era of
>evidence-based medicine, you are right.
>
>It was only a dozen years ago that decisions about intersex children,
>who make up roughly 1 in 2,500 births, were made independently by
>physicians. So when infants were born with congenital adrenal
>hyperplasia, in which the female sex organs do not respond to hormones
>in utero, doctors shortened the enlarged clitorises and created
>vaginas. Surgeons converted boys born with extremely small penises,
>a condition known as micropenis, into girls, building
>clitorises and vaginas.
>
>What led physicians to make such monumental decisions,
>often without consulting parents? The years after World War
>II represented a high watermark for Freudian psychiatry,
>with its emphasis on the significance of external
>genitalia. Physicians adopted this notion of anatomy as destiny, using
>surgery to create a clear gender identity.
>
>Postwar surgeons readily removed ovarian or testicular
>tissue and refashioned external sex organs. As the saying went, "A
>chance to cut is a chance to cure."
>
>The trouble was, it wasn't clear what was being cured. Or
>so said a group of intersex people who became activists in
>the 1990's. Some learned about their histories because of sexual or
>medical problems involving their genitals. Others obtained their
>medical records. What united them was anger that their variant
>genitalia had been treated like a disease and "corrected" secretly.
>
>Foremost among these activists is Cheryl Chase, born in
>1957 with a micropenis. Although initially considered to be
>a boy, doctors eventually amputated her genitals and told
>her parents to raise her as a girl. She lived with
>deception and shame for years before going public.
>
>Ms. Chase worked with other intersex people, academicians
>and doctors to found an advocacy organization, the Intersex Society of
>North America, in 1993. Like other health related advocacy groups that
>emerged after 1970, the society promoted full disclosure of medical
>information and informed consent. In the case of intersex, this
>strategy meant making parents active partners in decisions.
>
>Dr. Alice D. Dreger, a historian of medicine who until recently was the
>chairwoman of the intersex society's board, says that surgeons had
>sought to convert complex psychosocial issues into simple anatomical
>problems that could be fixed. This strategy, she adds, is based on
>supposition, not research.
>
>Given that such claims challenged long accepted dogma, it
>is not surprising that many surgeons and endocrinologists responded
>defensively. Some called the activists zealots.
>
>Today, almost all doctors involved with intersex infants
>say they believe that parents must actively participate in decisions.
>But that is where agreement ends.
>
>The intersex society has recently called for a moratorium
>on all nonlifesaving surgery on intersex children until
>they are old enough to participate in decisions. This
>policy stems in part from several recent studies, which
>found sexual and psychological problems among intersex
>adults who had surgery as infants.
>
>In one study, published in The Lancet in April, Catherine
>L. Minto, a British researcher, surveyed 39 intersex adults who were
>reared as women. All 28 who were sexually active reported having sexual
>difficulties; 18 who had undergone clitoral surgery said they had often
>experienced inability to achieve orgasm. Sharon E. Preves, a
>sociologist at Hamline University in Minnesota, who interviewed 37
>intersex adults for "Intersex and Identity," agrees, adding
>that the surgery is "experienced as degrading and shaming."
>
>
>"I have yet to read about, hear or meet an intersex person
>who is grateful for surgery done on them as an infant,"
>said Dr. Monica J. Casper, a sociologist who is executive director of
>the intersex society.
>
>When certain physicians, like Philip Gruppuso, a pediatric
>endocrinologist at Brown, see an intersex infant, they now usually
>recommend against surgery. Lacking proof of its value, Dr. Gruppuso
>says, deferring surgery is easy.
>
>Other doctors, however, object to such a blanket policy. It
>is one thing to advocate for patient autonomy, Dr. Kenneth
>I. Glassberg, a pediatric urologist at Columbia University, wrote in
>The Journal of Urology, but quite another to allow children with
>variant genitalia to "be considered freaks by their classmates."
>
>While Dr. Glassberg acknowledges that some celebrated cases
>of corrective surgery have gone poorly, he adds that most patients -
>akin to a silent majority - are content with their outcomes. A
>hard-and-fast rule against early surgery, he says, "is itself
>experimental, and more of an experiment" than the operations.
>
>One possible solution lies in collecting more data. A new
>task force, led by by a Medical University of South
>Carolina pediatric urologist, Dr. Ian A. Aaronson, is to
>issue formal guidelines.
>
>Yet gathering such information and applying it to the lives
>of newborns will not be easy. For one thing, most of the survey data
>come from intersex people who belong to activist groups. While
>compelling, these interviews may represent a biased sample.
>
>An intersex condition is not pneumonia, a medical problem amenable to
>antibiotics and outcome studies. Given the wide variety of intersex
>conditions and the intensely personal issues they raise, not even
>better data will provide parents with easy answers.
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/27/h...HA.html?ex=1055
>056371&ei=1&en=fd8640a941fcd45b
>
>
__________________
Until you've lost your reputation, you never realize what a burden it was or what freedom really is. --Margaret Mitchell


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Huge article in Swedish mag! Ana In The News 1 04-07-04 11:27 AM
3/22 Article on Intersex Janet In The News 1 03-22-04 12:10 PM
TIME Article Update Debbie In The News 1 01-21-04 08:45 AM
"Teaching About Intersex" Article in Women's Studies Quarterly Emi In The News 0 01-27-03 05:56 PM
intersex article Betsy In The News 0 06-10-02 06:27 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2005, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Images and Content Copyright © 2002-2004 Bodies Like Ours